Supreme Court hands Trump immunity for some attacks on election system

## Executive Summary The article reports on the Supreme Court's 6-3 ruling that presidents have broad immunity from criminal prosecution for official acts, discusses how that decision could shield many of Donald Trump’s alleged actions to subvert the 2020 election, summarizes dissenting opinions and expert concern about its democratic implications, and notes that lower courts must still decide whether other acts (e.g., fake electors) fall within official duties.