Supreme Court rejects effort to limit government communication on misinformation 

The Supreme Court dismissed claims by Missouri and Louisiana that federal agencies coerced social media platforms into censoring content, ruling the plaintiffs lacked standing and failed to show a real and imminent threat of harm. The majority found platforms exercised independent moderation incentives, though a three-justice dissent warned the interactions could represent implicit coercion; the decision preserves routine government-platform communications on misinformation and national-security issues while leaving room for further discovery in lower courts.