Spotless compliance evidence can still hide a broken control

In this interview, Marc Rubbinaccio outlines common mistakes and practical guidance for preparing for CMMC and FedRAMP 20x compliance: organizations often conflate high-level requirements with underlying assessment objectives, SOC 2 evidence can mask broken access-review controls, FedRAMP 20x demands continuous, machine-readable validation rather than manual evidence collection, AI should supplement (not replace) domain expertise, and small defense suppliers should tightly scope CUI, correctly configure enclave platforms, and choose experienced assessors.