Unearned Confidence: AI Security Reviewers Don’t Really Get It
ID: c46dee5a-4188-57dc-8219-abccbe6552e5
STIX ID: report--c46dee5a-4188-57dc-8219-abccbe6552e5
Feed Name: Checkmarx Zero
This Checkmarx post evaluates AI-based security review reliability by testing Claude Opus 4.6 against OpenEMR patches for two CVEs: a file-upload fix (CVE-2022-4506) and an XSS fix (CVE-2022-4733). The model produced a false positive about the file-upload hardening and suggested bypasses for the XSS patch (one of which worked in testing), illustrating that LLMs can sound authoritative yet miss contextual details like whitelisting and default configuration; the author concludes AI findings should be treated as hypotheses, not final verdicts.
Your team is not currently subscribed to this feed. You must subscribe to it in order to see this post.
