Pen test vendor rotation: do you need to change annually?
ID: 4a5579a3-e83c-5904-aacb-909ae7ab5cc3
STIX ID: report--4a5579a3-e83c-5904-aacb-909ae7ab5cc3
Feed Name: Bleeping Computer
This sponsored article evaluates the practice of annually rotating penetration testing vendors, outlining benefits like fresh perspectives and drawbacks such as inconsistency and onboarding overhead, and proposes PTaaS as a more sustainable alternative. It highlights how PTaaS—exemplified by Outpost24’s SWAT—provides continuous testing, standardized methodologies, real-time insights, scalability, and potential cost savings compared to traditional vendor rotation.
Your team is not currently subscribed to this feed. You must subscribe to it in order to see this post.
