logo

Clarity in complexity: New insights for transparent email security

ID: fc5950e3-b8b8-5077-a842-add30259dffb

STIX ID: report--fc5950e3-b8b8-5077-a842-add30259dffb

Feed Name: Microsoft Security

Date Published: 2025-12-10

Date Updated: 2026-04-28

Author: Scott Woodgate and Ramya Chitrakar

...
...

Microsoft’s second email security benchmarking report compares Defender-only, SEG+Defender, and ICES+Defender deployments using real-world threats, with an updated methodology that corrects misattribution from journaling/reinjection and includes Defender’s zero-hour auto purge. Findings show ICES layers notably reduce marketing/bulk email (~9.4% improvement) with modest gains for spam (~1.65%) and malicious (~0.5%) filtering; post-delivery, Defender removed ~45% of malicious emails that reached inboxes while ICES vendors accounted for ~55%. SEG comparisons indicate Defender missed fewer threats overall. The report underscores transparency and quarterly updates to guide optimization of layered email security.

Your team is not currently subscribed to this feed. You must subscribe to it in order to see this post.