logo

Memory-safe languages and security by design: Key insights, lessons learned

ID: c94f13cb-b20b-5347-85c3-3fa793ebb8c4

STIX ID: report--c94f13cb-b20b-5347-85c3-3fa793ebb8c4

Feed Name: ReversingLabs Blog

Date Published: 2024-03-21

Date Updated: 2026-04-29

Author: [email protected] (John P. Mello Jr.)

...
...

The report synthesizes Google’s lessons on achieving memory safety at scale, advocating security by design through broad adoption of memory-safe languages and safe-by-default coding that prohibits unsafe constructs except by explicit exception. It highlights limitations of retrofitting C++ for rigorous memory safety, notes that garbage-collected languages and Rust reduce common memory flaws, and outlines tradeoffs of sandboxing and performance. The authors stress that bug finding alone is insufficient without fixes and deployment, urging a long-term industry shift toward memory-safe ecosystems while improving existing C/C++ codebases by eliminating vulnerability-prone patterns.

Your team is not currently subscribed to this feed. You must subscribe to it in order to see this post.