12 AI Coding Agents Compared in 2026: Claude Code vs Antigravity vs Codex vs Cursor vs OpenCode vs Hermes
ID: bf180803-a222-50d4-987d-2804227c5ab8
STIX ID: report--bf180803-a222-50d4-987d-2804227c5ab8
Feed Name: Security Boulevard
Date Published: 2026-06-07
Date Updated: 2026-06-07
Author: SSOJet - Enterprise SSO & Identity Solutions
This June 2026 review compares 12 AI coding agents (Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, Cursor, Google Antigravity, GitHub Copilot, Windsurf, Devin, Google Jules, OpenCode, Hermes Agent, Aider, and Cline) across six criteria—public benchmark performance, underlying model options, pricing for heavy use, parallel/background execution, runtime surface, and openness/data control. Key takeaways: Claude Code (Anthropic Opus 4.8) leads SWE-bench Verified while OpenAI Codex (GPT-5.5) leads Terminal-Bench; several agents start at $20/month while Google Antigravity and multiple open-source tools offer free entry; parallel sub-agents and open-source, self-hosted options (OpenCode, Hermes, Aider, Cline) are notable; choose based on the primary constraint (capability, cost, data control, or background autonomy).
Your team is not currently subscribed to this feed. You must subscribe to it in order to see this post.
